Kelchi To Start?

Posted by  phil@hollogram.com   in  ,      4 years ago     709 Views     Leave your thoughts  

He’s magic, you knooooow… Kelchi Iheanacho!

Nacho has had a good few games when he has come on. Scoring the equalizer against Villa being one of them… With the upcoming game against Burnley is this the time we should start the Nigerian?

Is it time we started the game with him to give vardy some more space to run around up top?

We asked YOU, the fans, what you thought about starting Nacho against the Burnley fixture this weekend and here is what you had to say:

Nigel Wood: ‘ Ihaenacho & Vardy upfront with Perez sitting in behind ‘

Paula Garner: ‘ No he’s better as an impact sub but certainly have him on the bench ‘

Megan Elizibeth: ‘ Yes, vardy and nacho. ‘

Mick Hewitt: ‘ Yes and start Albrighton ‘

Roy Fellows: ‘ I’d start him every game now ‘

Jack Holiday: ‘ Yes definitely earned a place ‘

Matthew Fox: ‘ He deserves his chance but I wouldn’t drop Perez as I would drop Barnes and bring him on if we need fresh legs…people forget how much Perez can do he can bring the ball down well and he links up well with Ricardo on the wing. ‘

James O’Conner: ‘ Team needs a shake up, start Iheanacho, Albrighton, Gray and Fuchs. I’d like to see how Benkovic does in a tough PL game too, his height could be useful against Burnley and he won everything when he played against Wigan. Tough decision to drop either Soyuncu or Evan’s for him though. ‘

Michael Barrett: ‘ My team would be Schmeichel, Ricardo, Evans ,Soyuncu, Fuchs, Albrighton, Maddison, Mendy, Perez, Iheanacho, Vardy. 4-4-2 ‘

Jack Marson: ‘ Yes definitely and also albrighton and Fuchs ‘

Daniel Knights: ‘ I would with vards they look like they could be good together ‘

Reece Taylor: ‘ Ha! NO! ‘

No Comments

No comments yet. You should be kind and add one!

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags:   <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>